The Mirror of the Last Men

79

An exhibition about the war. White walls, perfect lighting, free wine. People with expressions of deep concern look at photographs of torn bodies - and somewhere behind their backs, glasses clink softly. This sound is appropriate. There is no cruelty in it, only the aestheticisation of death as cultural consumption. Tragedy becomes content, pain becomes an exhibit.

This is the mirror of the "last men". Death for them is an abstraction, properly lit and safely distant. It is not death itself that frightens, but living intensity at the moment of its approach.

The civilisation of the end of history is built around the absence of peaks. Its ideal is life as a horizontal line: flat, predictable, stripped of any obscene will to meaning. When chaos bursts into this sterile space, when irony appears amid ruins or the ability to write poems while the fields are burning, panic sets in. This breaks the rules of the game. This intensity frightens more than any death.

To tame chaos, the language of care has been invented. Trauma, resilience, assistance, recovery. These words do not describe an experience - they domesticate it, translating it from the language of the subject into the language of the object. As long as someone is a "victim", there is no need to recognise them as an equal. As long as the category of trauma holds, a person remains an exhibit and not a mirror.

But Ukraine is exactly that mirror. It is the ghost of a spring when meanings were worth dying for. The civilisation of comfort sees in this mirror what it was before it chose the safety of the horizontal line. Irritation is a reaction to light that is too bright. This civilisation wants to sleep, and the excess of our life keeps it from sleeping through its dream of the end of history.

Of course, not everyone speaks this language. Beside the last men stand those who drive in generators, who write about us in their own words, who put their own names on the line. They are not inside that ideology - they are inside the same frame. This text is about the others: about those who chose the position of an observer on the far side of the glass.

They are tired. Behind them lies a century of catastrophes, after which a truce with history itself gradually set in. The fatigue is understandable. But an exhaustion that has forgotten itself becomes numbness rather than peace. An anaesthetised organism does not tell warmth from a burn: it simply registers a stimulus and takes its hand away.

Here is where the abyss lies. Confidence in one's own presence: a glass of wine at a private view or a signature on a petition are taken for participation, and a worried look for solidarity. In answer to a scream they send a brochure on the rules of safe screaming. Sterility against chaos. Room temperature against heat. This is physically unpleasant contact: touching something living that long ago learned to imitate the temperature of its surroundings.

This is a diagnosis.

Kant has become a fridge magnet, Beethoven background music in a lift. The living has been turned into interior: convenient, calibrated, safe.

While this culture preserves, we give birth. While it makes museum pieces, we live. While it looks at our photographs from the distance of white walls, we stand inside the frame. And we refuse to step out.

Зв'язок

Залишити слово

Якщо текст торкнувся - напишіть.
Якщо є питання, пропозиція або просто
бажання бути почутим - це місце для цього.

[contact-form-7 id="999"]